Reaction to OMB decision
Thu, November 24, 2005
By FREE PRESS STAFF
"Obviously, there are pros and cons. One of the pros, you know who your
representative is and chances are you can get to that representative more
easily.
"On the other hand, when there are two representatives, if you got nowhere with
one you could go to other. . . . One thing I will say is I'm amazed one person
on the OMB can do this. I find this shocking that one person can change the
entire representation (system) in the city.''
Bob Young, University of Western Ontario political scientist
"I'm particularly surprised when you think of the context of this, in that (the
city) had two referendums -- one abolished board of control, the other reducing
council -- and those were both discussed in the ruling but the end result . . .
doesn't eliminate board of control or reduce size of council."
Andrew Sancton, University of Western Ontario political scientist
"The OMB shouldn't exist. It should be the right of the community to decide what
goes on in their city. Ontario is the only place in North America where there is
such a body. And while council is accountable to the voters, the OMB is
accountable to no one."
Mike Bradley, Sarnia mayor
"It's a bit disturbing that (a petition signed by) 900 people can entirely
change the shape of a city of more than 300,000. The next time 900 people band
together and petition to change the name of London to Woodstock the Annex, would
the OMB rule in favour of that? My preference would have been to have council
and the citizens work this out without interference from the OMB."
Gerry Macartney, general manager, London Chamber of Commerce
"Imagine London put together a fantastic proposal, but it may not be the only
proposal out there. City council could have had more public meetings, they could
have had an education campaign . . . they've been more focused on meeting
deadlines than engaging in a process that is representative of the citizens of
London."
Joshua Morgan, Ward 1 candidate in 2003 election, in a presentation to city
council May 17 regarding the need for greater public input on the issue of city
governance